Appeals court rejects Trump's mandatory ICE detention policy

CBS News Top ·

Appeals court rejects Trump's mandatory ICE detention policy

A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected the Trump administration's policy of making many of the immigrants it is trying to deport subject to mandatory detention by Immigration and Customs …

A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected the Trump administration's policy of making many of the immigrants it is trying to deport subject to mandatory detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, including those who have lived in the U.S. for years. A panel of judges from the New York-based 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals called the policy the "broadest mass-detention-without-bond mandate in our Nation's history for millions of noncitizens." The panel wrote that the Trump administration's interpretation of mandatory immigration detention would "send a seismic shock through our immigration detention system and society, straining our already overcrowded detention infrastructure, incarcerating millions, separating families, and disrupting communities." The ruling creates a judicial divide over the mass ICE detention policy . While most judges across the country have declared the policy illegal, the 5th Circuit and 8th Circuit Courts of Appeals, based in Louisiana and Missouri, respectively, have endorsed the Trump administration's interpretation of mandatory detention. The 2nd Circuit's decision applies to Connecticut, New York and Vermont. Tuesday's opinion was written by U.S. Circuit Judge Joseph Bianco, an appointee of President Trump, who was joined by Clinton appointee Jose Cabranes and Biden appointee Alison Nathan. Last year, the Trump administration reinterpreted a 1990s immigration law to disqualify broad groups of immigrants living in the U.S. …

Original source: CBS News Top

Mentioned

United States Supreme Court · Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) · New York · Missouri · Louisiana · Connecticut · Department of Homeland Security