Keir Starmer forced on back foot at PMQs over ‘weak’ defence plan
The Guardian World ·

Keir Starmer was forced on the defensive in the Commons over his long-delayed defence investment plan announced this week, which critics argue leaves his successor as prime minister, expected to be …
Keir Starmer was forced on the defensive in the Commons over his long-delayed defence investment plan announced this week, which critics argue leaves his successor as prime minister, expected to be Andy Burnham, with an extra £4.7bn to find in his first budget. Starmer defended his £298bn defence investment plan (Dip) at prime minister’s questions on Wednesday despite a growing backlash from insiders in Burnham’s team and from ministers and MPs resentful over cuts to key transport infrastructure projects to fund it. Overall, defence spending will rise from 2.6% of GDP in 2027 to 2.7%, or nearly £80bn, by 2030. Starmer said that would put the UK “on a trajectory” to hit 3% in the next parliament, although it remains well below a Nato target of 3.5% by 2035. Last year, under pressure from Donald Trump , Starmer and other Nato leaders committed to raising defence spending to 3.5% of GDP by 2035. According to a report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the Dip does not lay out a plan to get there. One Burnham ally likened the plan to an “unexploded bomb”. The Guardian understands the Makerfield MP was not told about the funding gap when he was briefed on the announcement. At what could be Starmer’s penultimate PMQs, Kemi Badenoch accused him of producing an insufficient plan. “It is not right, and it is not fair, certainly not to our troops who put their lives on the line for all of us every single day,” she said. …
Original source: The Guardian World
Mentioned
UK · NATO · Conservative · Donald Trump · Andy Burnham · Keir Starmer · Kemi Badenoch