Elon Musk tries again to escape FTC audits of X data handling
Ars Technica ·

Musk lost his previous lawsuit after the court found it had no authority to amend or end the FTC’s order. Musk is trying again with new arguments, complaining in a May petition to the FTC that they …
Musk lost his previous lawsuit after the court found it had no authority to amend or end the FTC’s order. Musk is trying again with new arguments, complaining in a May petition to the FTC that they should set aside the order “without delay.” According to Musk, the FTC should stop its monitoring because Twitter no longer exists, as X was merged into xAI , and then xAI was folded into SpaceX . Musk also argues that since none of the leadership or engineers responsible for the two-factor authentication error remain at the company, and “X has since built a world-class privacy and data-protection program” that protects consumers, the FTC doesn’t have to intervene anymore. The company further argued that it has paid $17 million in “needless costs,” since a lawsuit over the same two-factor authentication issue ended with a verdict in Twitter’s favor. If a court found that Twitter’s privacy policy adequately informed users that their contact info might be used for ad targeting, then the FTC should not be able to continue punishing X for that behavior, Musk argued. “The factual foundation of the FTC’s complaint has been dismantled,” X says. “And the Order’s staggering costs—imposed on both the Company and on the Commission itself are unjustifiable.” As X sees it, the order also requires the company to duplicate compliance efforts, because X already must take extra precautions with data to comply with laws like the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). …
Original source: Ars Technica
Mentioned
FTC · United States · Twitter · Elon Musk · Donald Trump · AI Action Plan · European Union