Poor supervision is pushing young researchers out of academia

PhD students preferred supervisors who were supportive and scheduled regular meetings. Credit: xavierarnau/Getty Bad experiences with supervisors are common among early-career researchers and one of the leading reasons they leave academia, a survey of more than 2,600 researchers has found 1 . The study, which was posted on the preprint server bioRxiv on 22 May and has not been peer reviewed, reveals the sizeable effect academic supervisors can have on scientists early in their career. Researchers at the University of the Basque Country in Leioa, Spain and their collaborators asked PhD, postdoctoral and former researchers more than 40 questions about their experiences — both positive and negative — with supervisors. Respondents came from 65 countries, but around 80% were based in Europe. The survey participants were asked whether they had experienced any adverse situations with their scientific supervisors, and were given a list of possible examples to choose from. Almost 40% of respondents said that their supervisor was disorganized and poor at communication. At least 30% reported one of the following issues: abrupt attitude changes; lack of support; lack of empathy; and supervisors contacting them outside working hours. When asked about the extent to which their supervisor’s attitude positively or negatively affected their mental health, roughly 31% said the impact was moderate, and 45% reported it was significant. …