On its 40th anniversary, we reassess 1986's SpaceCamp

Ars Technica ·

On its 40th anniversary, we reassess 1986's SpaceCamp

And into that post- Challenger disillusioned summer of 1986, Hollywood brought us SpaceCamp . It had all the right ingredients: A stacked cast with a solid leading duo (Kate Capshaw and Tom …

And into that post- Challenger disillusioned summer of 1986, Hollywood brought us SpaceCamp . It had all the right ingredients: A stacked cast with a solid leading duo (Kate Capshaw and Tom Skerritt), tons of real NASA location footage, and a big, brassy score by none other than John Williams. The film was completed before the Challenger disaster, leaving 20th Century Fox with something of a nightmarish choice on their hands—to shelve the film and lose millions, or send it to theaters and risk a PR disaster. For better or for worse, Fox chose to release the film, which ultimately made about $9.6 million on a reported $25 million budget. Ouch. Audiences, it seemed, weren’t really interested in watching a bunch of kids in peril on a space shuttle. Today, on the rare occasions SpaceCamp comes up in film discussions at all—usually among geeks of a certain age who encountered it when they were younger—it’s often spoken of with derision. Kids! Robots! Thermal curtain failures! Preposterous! But is it really a bad movie? It’s not currently available for streaming, but this is exactly the kind of scenario that physical media is made for. And so, with the movie’s 40th anniversary looming, Senior Space Editor Eric Berger and I grabbed the DVD and watched our way through it—and this is what we thought. Lee : It’s been about 18 hours since we watched SpaceCamp , which is maybe just a bit longer than the kids spent in orbit. …

Original source: Ars Technica

Mentioned

Hollywood · Challenger · Johnson Space Center